Although
Buddhism never developed a missionary movement, Buddha’s teachings nevertheless spread far and
wide on the Indian subcontinent and from there throughout Asia. In each new
culture it reached, the Buddhist methods and styles were modified to fit the
local mentality, without compromising the essential points of wisdom and compassion.
Buddhism, however, never developed an overall hierarchy of religious authority
with a supreme head. Each country to which it spread developed its own forms, its
own religious structure and its own spiritual head. The most well-known and
internationally respected of these authorities at present is His Holiness the
Dalai Lama of Tibet.
There
are two major divisions of Buddhism. The Hinayana, or Modest Vehicle, emphasizes personal liberation,
while the Mahayana, or Vast Vehicle, stresses working to
become a fully enlightened Buddha in order to be best able to help others. Each
has many sub-divisions. At present, however, three major forms survive: one
Hinayana, known as Theravada, in Southeast Asia, and two Mahayana, namely the
Chinese and Tibetan traditions.
The
Theravada tradition spread from India to Sri Lanka and Burma in the third
century BCE, and from there to Yunnan in southwest China, Thailand, Laos,
Cambodia, South Vietnam and Indonesia. Pockets of Indian merchants practicing
Buddhism were soon found on the coast of the Arabian Peninsula and even as far
as Alexandria, Egypt. Other forms of Hinayana spread from that time to modern-day Pakistan, Kashmir, Afghanistan,
eastern and coastal Iran, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Tajikistan. These were
the ancient states of Gandhara, Bactria, Parthia and Sogdia. From this base in
Central Asia, they spread further in the second century CE to East Turkistan
(Xinjiang) and further into China, and in the late seventh century to
Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan. These forms of Hinayana were later combined with
Mahayana aspects that also came from India so that Mahayana eventually became
the dominant form of Buddhism in most of Central Asia.
The
Chinese form of Mahayana later spread to Korea, Japan and North Vietnam.
Another early wave of Mahayana, mixed with Shaivite forms of Hinduism, spread
from India to Nepal, Indonesia, Malaysia and parts of Southeast Asia starting
in about the fifth century. The Tibetan Mahayana tradition, which, starting in
the seventh century, inherited the full historical development of Indian
Buddhism, spread throughout the Himalayan regions and to Mongolia, East
Turkistan, Kyrgyzstan, Kazakhstan, northern Inner China, Manchuria, Siberia and
the Kalmyk Mongol region near the Caspian Sea in European Russia.
The Manner in Which
Buddhism Spread
The
expansion of Buddhism throughout most of Asia was peaceful and occurred in
several ways. Shakyamuni Buddha set the precedent. Being
primarily a teacher, he traveled to nearby kingdoms to share his insights with those who were receptive and
interested. Likewise, he instructed his monks to go forth in the world and
expound his teachings. He did not ask others to denounce and give up their own
religion and convert to a new one, for he was not seeking to establish his own
religion. He was merely trying to help others overcome the unhappiness and suffering that they were creating
for themselves because of their lack of understanding. Later generations of
followers were inspired by Buddha's example and shared with others his methods
that they found useful in their lives. This is how what is now called
"Buddhism" spread far and wide.
Sometimes
the process evolved organically. For example, when Buddhist merchants visited
and settled in different lands, some members of the local populations naturally
developed interest in these foreigners' beliefs, as with the introduction of
Islam to Indonesia and Malaysia. Such a process occurred with Buddhism in the
oasis states along the Silk Route in Central Asia during the two centuries
before and after the common era. As local rulers and their people learned more
about this Indian religion, they invited monks from the merchants' native regions
as advisors or teachers and, in this manner, eventually adopted the Buddhist
faith. Another organic method was through the slow cultural assimilation of a
conquering people, such as the Greeks into the Buddhist society of Gandhara in
present-day central Pakistan during the centuries following the second century
BCE.
Often,
however, the dissemination was due primarily to the influence of a powerful
monarch who had adopted and supported Buddhism himself. In the mid-third century BCE, for
example, Buddhism spread throughout northern India as the result of the
personal endorsement of King Ashoka. This great empire-builder did not force
his subjects to adopt the Buddhist faith. But by posting edicts engraved on
iron pillars throughout his realm exhorting his people to lead an ethical life
and by following these principles himself, he inspired others to adopt Buddha's
teachings.
King
Ashoka also actively proselytised outside his kingdom by
sending missions to distant lands. On some occasions, he acted upon the invitation
of foreign rulers, such as King Tishya of Sri Lanka. On others, he sent monks
as envoys at his own initiative. These visiting monastics, however, did not
forcefully pressure others to convert, but simply made Buddha's teachings
available, allowing people to choose for themselves. This is evidenced by the
fact that in such places as South India and southern Burma, Buddhism soon took
root, while in others, such as the Greek colonies in Central Asia; there is no
record of any immediate impact.
Other
religious kings, such as the sixteenth century Mongol potentate Altan Khan,
invited Buddhist teachers to their realm and proclaimed Buddhism the official
creed of the land in order to help unify their people and consolidate their
rule. In the process they may have prohibited certain practices of
non-Buddhist, indigenous religions and even persecuted those who followed them,
but these heavy-handed moves were primarily politicallymotivated.
Such ambitious rulers never forced their subjects to adopt Buddhist forms of
belief or worship. This is not part of the religious creed.
If
Shakyamuni Buddha told people not to follow his teachings out of blind faith,
but to examine them carefully themselves before accepting them, how much less
so should people accept Buddha's teachings out of coercion from zealous
missionaries or royal decree. Thus, for instance, when Neiji Toin in the early
seventeenth century CE tried to bribe Eastern Mongol nomads into following
Buddhism by offering them livestock for each verse they
memorized, people complained to the highest authorities. In the end, this
overbearing teacher was punished and exiled.
No comments:
Post a Comment