Patriotism is generally cultural attachment to one's homeland or devotion to one's country, although
interpretations of the term vary with context, geography and philosophy. It is a related sentiment to nationalism. The English term patriot is first
attested in the Elizabethan era, via Middle French from Late Latin (6th
century) patriota "countryman", ultimately from Greek (patriots) "countryman", from (patris),
"fatherland”. The abstract noun patriotism appears
in the early 18th century The general notion of civic virtue and group dedication has been attested in culture
globally throughout the historical period. For the Enlightenment thinkers
of 18th-century Europe, loyalty to the state was chiefly considered in contrast
to loyalty to the Church. It was argued that clerics should not be allowed to
teach in public schools since their patrie was heaven, so that they could not inspire love of
the homeland in their students. One of the most influential proponents of this
classical notion of patriotism was Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Enlightenment thinkers also criticized what they saw as the excesses of
patriotism. In 1774, Samuel Johnson published The
Patriot, a critique of what he viewed as false patriotism. On the evening of 7
April 1775, he made the famous statement, "Patriotism is the last refuge
of the scoundrel." James Boswell, who
reported this comment in his Life of Johnson, does not
provide context for the quote, and it has therefore been argued that Johnson
was in fact attacking the false use of the term "patriotism" by
contemporaries such as John Stuart, 3rd Earl of
Bute (the patriot-minister) and his supporters; Johnson
spoke elsewhere in favour of what he considered "true" patriotism.
However, there is no direct evidence to contradict the widely held belief that
Johnson's famous remark was a criticism of patriotism itself. Patriotism may be strengthened by adherence to a national religion (a civil religion or even a theocracy). This is the opposite of the separation
of church and state demanded by the Enlightenment
thinkers who saw patriotism and faith as similar and opposed forces. Michael Billig and Jean Bethke Elshtain have both argued that the difference between patriotism
and faith is difficult to discern and relies largely on the attitude of the one
doing the labelling. Marxists have
taken various stances regarding patriotism. On one hand, Karl Marx famously stated that "The working
men have no country” and that "the supremacy of the proletariat will cause
them [national differences] to vanish still faster." The same view is
promoted by present-day Trotskyists such as Alan Woods, who is "in favour of
tearing down all frontiers and creating a socialist world commonwealth."
On the other hand, Stalinists and Maoists are usually in favour of socialist patriotism based on the theory of socialism in one country.
An Anti-Patriotism is the ideology that opposes patriotism;
it usually refers to those with cosmopolitan views and is usually of an anti-nationalist nature as well.
Normally, anti-patriotism stems from the belief that patriotism is wrong since
people born in a country, whether they like it or not and regardless of their individuality,
are encouraged to love the country or sacrifice themselves for it;
consequently, people who oppose patriotism may oppose its perceived authoritarianism,
while others may believe that patriotism may lead to war because of geopolitical disputes, so it may be
viewed from a pacifistor anti-militarist point of view. Usually,
this term is used in a pejorative way by those who defend patriotism or nationalism,
and terms such as cosmopolitanism or world citizenship may be used to avoid the
bias that comes from the typical usage of the words anti-patriot or anti-patriotism.
The idea of multiple cultures intertwined has also been questioned as
anti-patriotic, but mainly in smaller social communities: colleges,
universities, etc..
No comments:
Post a Comment